data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2e72/f2e720f976028c9f3af12debc9c3b22f838ff671" alt=""
i'm so dissappointed. what used to be such a smart and funny read is now just cosmo in jane clothing. for chrissake-- this month there was an article called something like "10 sex tips...for you!" the "10 sex tips" part was pure glamour mag. the "...for you!" add-on was the afterthought insisted upon by the new non-Jane-Pratt editor, saying, "remember, writers [i.e. ex-cosmo interns], this is jane. and at jane, we are strong women!" i can imagine all the little conde nasties scratching their heads, then turning to their macs to type out another brilliant sex tip ("wear a long skirt on a picnic. then no one will know when you're acting randy!") ugh. the old jane magazine was awesome. jane in the era of conde nast? so unpretty. so very unpretty.
3 comments:
the only mag i can stand anymore is real simple...oh, and Vanity Fair's Hollywood issue once a year.
everything thing else is just a beauty recycling bin.
that's because real simple has an aweomse editor.
Yeah, she's the bomb. Although I partly agree with UP in that the mag should be called Real Obvious.
:p
Post a Comment